RFR: 8262108: SimpleDateFormat formatting broken for sq_MK Locale [v4]
Jaikiran Pai
jpai at openjdk.java.net
Fri Apr 16 02:38:36 UTC 2021
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 03:57:18 GMT, Naoto Sato <naoto at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - update existing testcase based on review comment
>> - Improve code comment to be clear it's only applicable for java.util.Calendar
>> - Remove irrelevant setLenient from new testcase
>
> test/jdk/java/util/Calendar/NarrowNamesTest.java line 115:
>
>> 113: } else {
>> 114: testMap(US, AM_PM, ALL_STYLES,
>> 115: "AM", "PM",
>
> What I meant was there is no need to check the providers and introduce the am/pm specific test method. Both `CLDR` and `COMPAT` (i.e., no "if" statement) should be tested with `testMap()` method as other tests do.
Hello Naoto,
As far as I can see, the testMap cannot be used to test the day period strings. More specifically, consider this change (git diff) that I did as you suggested (unless I misunderstood what you meant):
+ testMap(US, AM_PM, ALL_STYLES,
+ "AM",
+ "PM",
+ "midnight",
+ "noon",
+ "in the morning",
+ "",
+ "in the afternoon",
+ "",
+ "in the evening",
+ "",
+ "at night",
+ "",
+ RESET_INDEX,
+ "a", "p", "mi", "n", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", "");
+ testMap(US, AM_PM, ALL_STYLES,
+ "AM", "PM",
+ RESET_INDEX,
+ "a", "p");
This will fail with the following error.
testMap: locale=en_US, field=9, style=0, expected={in the afternoon=6, in the evening=8, in the morning=4, at night=10, midnight=2, noon=3, AM=0, PM=1, mi=2, a=0, n=3, p=1}, got={AM=0, PM=1, a=0, p=1}
java.lang.RuntimeException: test failed
That failure is due to the `testMap` method expecting these day period string to be part of the returned Map from `Calendar.getDisplayNames()` which won't be the case because that API (as per the javadoc) will only return a Map whose display names have valid field values, so in this case only those display names which will have `AM` or `PM` as a value.
If it's easier to review, I will go ahead and push the suggested change in this testcase and let if fail so that you can get a chance to look at the actual test code and error. Let me know.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3463
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list