RFR: 8078641: MethodHandle.asTypeCache can retain classes from unloading
Paul Sandoz
psandoz at openjdk.java.net
Thu Aug 26 18:16:29 UTC 2021
On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:31:51 GMT, Vladimir Ivanov <vlivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:
> `MethodHandle.asTypeCache` keeps a strong reference to adapted `MethodHandle` and it can introduce a class loader leak through its `MethodType`.
>
> Proposed fix introduces a 2-level cache (1 element each) where 1st level can only contain `MethodHandle`s which are guaranteed to not introduce any dependencies on new class loaders compared to the original `MethodHandle`. 2nd level is backed by a `SoftReference` and is used as a backup when the result of `MethodHandle.asType()` conversion can't populate the higher level cache.
>
> The fix is based on [the work](http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk9-dev/MethodHandle.asTypeCacheLeak/) made by Peter Levart @plevart back in 2015.
>
> Testing: tier1 - tier6
Looks good.
I guess it is not that common for the soft ref to get instantiated i.e. for the case of the ~common class loader of `type`, MTC say, and the ~common classoader of `newType`, NMTC say, then NMTC is not an ancestor of MTC.
It's possible that `asTypeCache` and `asTypeSoftCache` could both be non-null i.e. we don't null out one of them, buy does not seem a problem.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandle.java line 869:
> 867: }
> 868: at = asTypeUncached(newType);
> 869: return setAsTypeCache(at);
The following may be a little clearer
Suggestion:
MethodHandle at = asTypeCached(newType);
return at != null
? at
: setAsTypeCache(asTypeUncached(newType));
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandle.java line 953:
> 951:
> 952: /* Determine whether {@code descendant} keeps {@code ancestor} alive through the loader delegation chain. */
> 953: private static boolean keepsAlive(ClassLoader ancestor, ClassLoader descendant) {
Might be clearer to name the method by what it is e.g. isAncestor
// Returns true if ancestor can be found descendant's delegation chain.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by psandoz (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5246
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list