Integrated: 8260934: java/lang/StringBuilder/HugeCapacity.java fails without Compact Strings

Aleksey Shipilev shade at openjdk.java.net
Wed Feb 10 07:35:38 UTC 2021


On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:38:01 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> $ CONF=linux-x86_64-server-fastdebug make run-test TEST=java/lang/StringBuilder/HugeCapacity.java TEST_VM_OPTS=-XX:-CompactStrings
> 
> STDERR:
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Required length exceeds implementation limit
> at java.base/java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.newCapacity(AbstractStringBuilder.java:259)
> at java.base/java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.ensureCapacityInternal(AbstractStringBuilder.java:229)
> at java.base/java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.ensureCapacity(AbstractStringBuilder.java:213)
> at java.base/java.lang.StringBuilder.ensureCapacity(StringBuilder.java:87)
> at HugeCapacity.testLatin1(HugeCapacity.java:49)
> at HugeCapacity.main(HugeCapacity.java:37)
> 
> I went back and forth in fixing this test, and I think the best we can do is sense the current setting on `CompactStrings` and choose the test configuration based on that. The alternative is to use `WhiteBox` within the test (tried, it is quite a bit ugly). Note that this test deliberately does not run `-XX:-CompactStrings` even when `vm.opt.final.CompactStrings` returns true (= "available"), because that might mean `TEST_VM_OPTS=-XX:+CompactStrings` is in effect, and we have the VM option conflict.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [x] Linux x86_64, affected test (default), passes
>  - [x] Linux x86_64, affected test (`-XX:-CompactStrings`), passes
>  - [x] Linux x86_64, affected test (`-XX:+CompactStrings`), passes

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: ad54d8dd
Author:    Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/ad54d8dd
Stats:     12 lines in 1 file changed: 7 ins; 0 del; 5 mod

8260934: java/lang/StringBuilder/HugeCapacity.java fails without Compact Strings

Reviewed-by: iklam

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2355


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list