[jdk16] RFR: 8259636: Check for buffer backed by shared segment kicks in in unexpected places
Maurizio Cimadamore
mcimadamore at openjdk.java.net
Tue Jan 12 15:53:11 UTC 2021
When support for shared segment was added, we decided to disable support for buffers derived from shared segment in certain async operations, as there's currently no way to make sure that the memory won't be reclaimed while the IO operation is still taking place.
After looking at the code, it seemed like the best place to put the restriction would be sun.nio.ch.DirectBuffer::address() method, since this method is used in a lot of places just before jumping into some piece of JNI code.
While I still stand by that decision, the Netty team has discovered that this decision also affected operations such as creating slices from byte buffers derived from shared segment - this is caused by the fact that one direct buffer constructor (the one for views and slices) is calling the dreaded DirectBuffer::address method.
The fix is simple: just avoid the method call - which is very easy to do in the case of the buffer constructor: in fact this method just returns the value of the `address` field inside the `Buffer` class, so we can always cast to `Buffer` and then access `address` field from there.
-------------
Commit messages:
- Tweak direct buffer slice constructor not to use DirectBuffer::address
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/110/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk16&pr=110&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8259636
Stats: 19 lines in 2 files changed: 18 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/110.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16 pull/110/head:pull/110
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16/pull/110
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list