[jdk17] RFR: 8269240: java/foreign/stackwalk/TestAsyncStackWalk.java test failed with concurrent GC [v3]
David Holmes
dholmes at openjdk.java.net
Fri Jul 16 02:20:16 UTC 2021
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:54:50 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jvernee at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This patch rewrites the prologue and epilogue of panama upcalls, in order to fix the test failure from the title.
>>
>> Previously, we did a call to potentially attach the current thread to the VM, and then afterwards did the same suspend and stack reguard checks that we do on the back-edge of a native downcall. Then, on the back edge of the upcall we did another conditional call to detach the thread.
>>
>> The suspend and reguard checks on the front-edge are incorrect, so I've changed the 2 calls to mimic what is done by JavaCallWrapper instead (with attach and detach included), and removed the old suspend and stack reguard checks.
>>
>> FWIW, this removes the JavaFrameAnchor save/restore MacroAssembler code. This is now written in C++. Also, MacroAssembler code was added to save/restore the result of the upcall around the call on the back-edge, which was previously missing. Since the new code allocates a handle block as well, I've added handling for those oops to frame & OptimizedUpcallBlob.
>>
>> Testing: local running of `jdk_foreign` on Windows and Linux (WSL). Tier 1-3
>
> Jorn Vernee has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Address David's review comments
Thanks for the updates.
Minor comments below.
David
src/hotspot/share/prims/universalUpcallHandler.cpp line 62:
> 60: guarantee(result == JNI_OK, "Could not attach thread for upcall. JNI error code: %d", result);
> 61: *should_detach = true;
> 62: thread = Thread::current();
You could use JavaThread::current() here and avoid the later conversions.
src/hotspot/share/prims/universalUpcallHandler.cpp line 138:
> 136: debug_only(thread->dec_java_call_counter());
> 137:
> 138: // Old thread-local info. has been restored. We are not back in native code.
Pre-existing: I think "not" should be "now".
-------------
Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/149
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list