RFR: 8190753: (zipfs): Accessing a large entry (> 2^31 bytes) leads to a negative initial size for ByteArrayOutputStream [v11]

Jaikiran Pai jpai at openjdk.java.net
Tue Jul 27 01:57:52 UTC 2021


On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:58:01 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <jpai at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Can I please get a review for this proposed fix for the issue reported in https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8190753?
>> 
>> The commit here checks for the size of the zip entry before trying to create a `ByteArrayOutputStream` for that entry's content. A new jtreg test has been included in this commit to reproduce the issue and verify the fix.
>> 
>> P.S: It's still a bit arguable whether it's a good idea to create the `ByteArrayOutputStream` with an initial size potentially as large as the `MAX_ARRAY_SIZE` or whether it's better to just use some smaller default value. However, I think that can be addressed separately while dealing with https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8011146
>
> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 15 additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge latest from master branch
>  - Implement review suggestions:
>     - remove unnecessary "synchronized"
>     - no need to open the temp file twice
>  - remove no longer necessary javadoc comment on test
>  - review suggestion - wrap ByteArrayOutputStream instead of extending it
>  - reorganize the tests now that the temp file creation threshold isn't exposed as a user configurable value
>  - minor update to comment on FileRolloverOutputStream class
>  - remove no longer used constant
>  - use jtreg's construct of manual test
>  - Implement Alan's review suggestion - don't expose the threshold as a configuration property, instead set it internally to a specific value
>  - propagate back the original checked IOException to the callers
>  - ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/f875aac8...991de6b9

Thank you for running the tests, Lance.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4607


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list