better random numbers

[Stefan Zobel]

>
> On this blog entry (year 2017), Lemire is not giving any technical or
> scientific argument in favor or against PCG.
>
> He also refers to, and quotes from, a blog entry (year 2015) of an
> influential researcher (whose work he respects) suggesting the entry has
> harsh words about PCG. The fact is, that entry doesn't mention PCG or
> O'Neill at all and the quotation if not found there.
>

That "influential researcher" is probably Sebastiano Vigna who has indeed
harsh words on PCG: https://pcg.di.unimi.it/pcg.php