RFR: 8281146: Replace StringCoding.hasNegatives with countPositives

[Claes Redestad]

On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 12:51:31 GMT, Claes Redestad <redestad at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I'm requesting comments and, hopefully, some help with this patch to replace `StringCoding.hasNegatives` with `countPositives`. The new method does a very similar pass, but alters the intrinsic to return the number of leading bytes in the `byte[]` range which only has positive bytes. This allows for dealing much more efficiently with those `byte[]`s that has a ASCII prefix, with no measurable cost on ASCII-only or latin1/UTF16-mostly input.
> 
> Microbenchmark results: https://jmh.morethan.io/?gists=428b487e92e3e47ccb7f169501600a88,3c585de7435506d3a3bdb32160fe8904
> 
> - Only implemented on x86 for now, but I want to verify that implementations of `countPositives` can be implemented with similar efficiency on all platforms that today implement a `hasNegatives` intrinsic (aarch64, ppc etc) before moving ahead. This pretty much means holding up this until it's implemented on all platforms, which can either contributed to this PR or as dependent follow-ups.
> 
> - An alternative to holding up until all platforms are on board is to allow the implementation of `StringCoding.hasNegatives` and `countPositives` to be implemented so that the non-intrinsified method calls into the intrinsified. This requires structuring the implementations differently based on which intrinsic - if any - is actually implemented. One way to do this could be to mimic how `java.nio` handles unaligned accesses and expose which intrinsic is available via `Unsafe` into a `static final` field.
> 
> - There are a few minor regressions (~5%) in the x86 implementation on `encode-/decodeLatin1Short`. Those regressions disappear when mixing inputs, for example `encode-/decodeShortMixed` even see a minor improvement, which makes me consider those corner case regressions with little real world implications (if you have latin1 Strings, you're likely to also have ASCII-only strings in your mix).

> Hi Claes, it can get implemented similarly on PPC64: #7430 You can integrate it if you prefer that, but better after it got a Review.

Hi Martin, perfect!

Ideally we can get all platforms that has a `hasNegatives` intrinsic moved over so we can just switch it over big-bang style: remove the `@IntrinsicCandidate`, avoid contortions to pick the "right" implementation on the Java level based on which intrinsic is available and drop all VM-internal scaffolding for `hasNegatives`. Then it makes perfect sense to fold your patch into this PR, rather than have a tail of follow-ups.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7231