RFR: JDK-8277795: ldap connection timeout not honoured under contention [v3]

[Rob McKenna]

On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:30:46 GMT, Mark Sheppard <msheppar at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> yes a redeclaration of  timeout with a type long  across the  component would be a consistent approach, also
>
> so just to clarify, we're not taking the  approach to homogenise the timeout declarations, throughout the component, to be of type long?
> 
> which would see LdapClientFactory constructor take a long timeout and  timeout member varaiables be redefined as long

Not in this issue. I plan to file a follow up bug to make a slight change to the test. I would like to get this issue fixed ASAP and would appreciate the time to take a good look at the transition to a long timeout. (i.e. I'll handle it in that follow up issue)

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6568