PriorityQueue PR requiring review

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Mar 3 12:57:32 UTC 2022


On 3/03/2022 10:47 pm, Julian Waters wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> I did not create the PR, I'm instead asking for others to review it 
> before I help the author create the issue on the JBS. Should I just go 
> ahead and create the issue for them?

The best thing would be for the PR creator to discuss the proposed API 
addition on the mailing list first. I have a fairly good idea what the 
outcome of that discussion will be but ... :)

Cheers,
David

> best regards,
> Julian
> 
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 8:45 PM David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com 
> <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Julian,
> 
>     On 3/03/2022 10:33 pm, Jules W. wrote:
>      > Hi all,
>      >
>      > A new PR that adds methods to PriorityQueue was created some time
>     ago at
>      > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/6938
>     <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/6938> but has no corresponding
>     issue. As
>      > I'm not too familiar with this part of the JDK I'm querying this
>     mailing
>      > list for anyone to properly review the PR before I create an
>     issue for it
>      > in the JBS
> 
>     First you need an issue, then you review a PR. Your PR would not be
>     seen
>     by anyone unless they go looking for it, as without the association
>     with
>     an issue, the system will not send the email to the mailing lists.
> 
>     I see someone is helping you create the issue so things should progress
>     in that sense. But note the bar for adding to a public API is set
>     very high.
> 
>     Cheers,
>     David
> 
>      > best regards,
>      > Julian Waters
> 


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list