PriorityQueue PR requiring review
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Mar 3 12:57:32 UTC 2022
On 3/03/2022 10:47 pm, Julian Waters wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I did not create the PR, I'm instead asking for others to review it
> before I help the author create the issue on the JBS. Should I just go
> ahead and create the issue for them?
The best thing would be for the PR creator to discuss the proposed API
addition on the mailing list first. I have a fairly good idea what the
outcome of that discussion will be but ... :)
Cheers,
David
> best regards,
> Julian
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 8:45 PM David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com
> <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> On 3/03/2022 10:33 pm, Jules W. wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A new PR that adds methods to PriorityQueue was created some time
> ago at
> > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/6938
> <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/6938> but has no corresponding
> issue. As
> > I'm not too familiar with this part of the JDK I'm querying this
> mailing
> > list for anyone to properly review the PR before I create an
> issue for it
> > in the JBS
>
> First you need an issue, then you review a PR. Your PR would not be
> seen
> by anyone unless they go looking for it, as without the association
> with
> an issue, the system will not send the email to the mailing lists.
>
> I see someone is helping you create the issue so things should progress
> in that sense. But note the bar for adding to a public API is set
> very high.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> > best regards,
> > Julian Waters
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list