RFR: 8215788: Clarify JarInputStream Manifest access [v7]
Lance Andersen
lancea at openjdk.org
Tue Sep 20 17:48:36 UTC 2022
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 17:37:50 GMT, Alan Bateman <alanb at openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> > OK, will make another pass at this today
>>>
>>> I looked at the latest draft ([2bafc00](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/2bafc00cc462b7af3f724371ac1bef5fd99c989c)). I think it would help if the section "Verifying a JarInputStream" were renamed to "Signed JAR files".
>>
>> OK, I will change as you suggest
>>
>> The link to getManifest makes the reader wonder if they have to call this method whereas I think what you want to say that the manifest must be at the start of the stream (as per the first section) and then followed by signature entries.
>>
>> The reason I used the getManifest wording is I felt it was easier and less redundant than copying the wording about the Manifest needing to be either the first or second entry (assuming META-INF/ is the first in the stream). However if you prefer that, I will make that change.
>
> Thanks for the updates in 69138715. Just one comment on the updated text, and specifically this sentence:
>
> + * A {@code JarInputStream} may be used to verify the signatures of a
> + * <a href="{@docRoot}/../specs/jar/jar.html#signed-jar-file">signed JAR file</a>
> + * assuming the following requirements are met:
>
> The signatures are verified by default so I think you can reduce this down to:
>
> A {@code JarInputStream} verifies the signatures of entries in a <a href="{@docRoot}/../specs/jar/jar.html#signed-jar-file">Signed JAR file</a> when:
>
> We could say that a program could opt-out of verification by using the 2-arg constructor but that is probably too much to try to fit in here.
> Thanks for the updates in [6913871](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/691387157f01602ee25a1887223e00f880d071d1). Just one comment on the updated text, and specifically this sentence:
>
> * * A {@code JarInputStream} may be used to verify the signatures of a
> * * [signed JAR file]({@docRoot}/../specs/jar/jar.html#signed-jar-file)
> * * assuming the following requirements are met:
>
> The signatures are verified by default so I think you can reduce this down to:
>
> A {@code JarInputStream} verifies the signatures of entries in a [Signed JAR file]({@docRoot}/../specs/jar/jar.html#signed-jar-file) when:
>
> We could say that a program could opt-out of verification by using the 2-arg constructor but that is probably too much to try to fit in here.
Updated per your suggestion above.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10045
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list