RFR: 8305425: Thread.isAlive0 doesn't need to call into the VM [v3]
David Holmes
dholmes at openjdk.org
Mon Apr 3 22:41:44 UTC 2023
> We have the strange situation where calling `t.isAlive()` on a `java.lang.Thread` `t`, will call into the VM (via `alive()` then `isAlive0()`) where the VM then examines the `eetop` field of `t` to extract its `JavaThread` pointer and compare it to null. We can simply read `eetop` directly in `Thread.alive()`:
>
> boolean alive() {
> return eetop != 0;
> }
>
> I also updated a comment in relation to `eetop`.
>
> Testing: tiers 1-3
>
> Thanks
David Holmes has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
Ensure HB relationship exists; additional explanatory comments
-------------
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13287/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13287/files/fc1e1aba..e4bb5d66
Webrevs:
- full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=13287&range=02
- incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=13287&range=01-02
Stats: 8 lines in 1 file changed: 5 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13287.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13287/head:pull/13287
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13287
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list