RFR: JDK-8170945: Collectors$Partition should override more Map methods
Viktor Klang
duke at openjdk.org
Wed Apr 5 13:28:13 UTC 2023
On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 12:49:31 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev <tvaleev at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Adds overrides for common Map operations to avoid having to allocate the entrySet for Collectors$Partition maps.
>
> Another thing I noticed is that `keySet()` of this map is a constant. If we want to preserve the order, we can use something like this:
>
>
> @Override
> public Set<Boolean> keySet() {
> return KeySet.INSTANCE;
> }
>
> private static class KeySet extends AbstractSet<Boolean> {
> private static final KeySet INSTANCE = new KeySet();
>
> public Iterator<Boolean> iterator() {
> return List.of(false, true).iterator();
> }
>
> public int size() {
> return 2;
> }
>
> @Override
> public int hashCode() {
> // Boolean.hashCode(true) + Boolean.hashCode(false)
> return 1237 + 1231;
> }
>
> @Override
> public boolean equals(Object o) {
> return o instanceof Set<?> s &&
> s.size() == 2 &&
> s.contains(false) && s.contains(true);
> }
>
> public boolean isEmpty() {
> return false;
> }
>
> public boolean contains(Object k) {
> return k instanceof Boolean;
> }
>
> @Override
> public void forEach(Consumer<? super Boolean> action) {
> Objects.requireNonNull(action);
> action.accept(false);
> action.accept(true);
> }
>
> @Override
> public String toString() {
> return "[false, true]";
> }
> }
>
>
> Overengineering, probably? On the other hand, it might be useful to expose this set somewhere, like `Collections.booleans()`? This would allow using `for(boolean b: Collections.booleans()) {...}`. In our codebase, I see quite many loops like `for (boolean b : new boolean[]{false, true})`. Declaring it as a `SequencedSet` would be even more useful, as one may control the order via `Collections.booleans().reversed()`.
@amaembo I think ideally the entire Partition class could be replaced in favor of some `OrderedMap.of(Boolean.TRUE, forTrue, Boolean.FALSE, forFalse)` version. I'll let @stuart-marks chime in if there's other options on the table here. :)
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13347#issuecomment-1497483295
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list