RFR: 6983726: remove Proxy from MethodHandleProxies.asInterfaceInstance SAM conversion [v6]
Johannes Kuhn
jkuhn at openjdk.org
Thu Apr 6 16:00:20 UTC 2023
On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 03:44:07 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues:
>> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance interface)
>> 2. Does not allow future expansion to support SAM[^1] abstract classes
>> 3. Slow (in fact, very slow)
>>
>> This patch addresses all 3 problems:
>> 1. It implements proxies with one hidden class for each requested interface and replaced WrapperInstance inheritance with an annotation. This can avoid unexpected passing of `instanceof`, and avoids the nasty problem of exporting a JDK interface to a dynamic module to ensure access.
>> 2. This patch obtains already generated classes from a ClassValue by the requested interface type; the ClassValue can later be updated to compute implementation generation for abstract classes as well.
>> 3. This patch's generated hidden classes has call performance on par with those of lambda expressions; the creation performance is slightly less than that of LambdaMetafactory: https://jmh.morethan.io/?gist=fcb946d83ee4ac7386901795ca49b224
>>
>> Additionally, an obsolete `ProxyForMethodHandle` test was removed, for it's no longer applicable. Tests in `jdk/java/lang/invoke` and `jdk/java/lang/reflect` pass.
>>
>> In addition, I have a question: in [8161245](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8161245) it seems some fields can be optimized as seen in [ciField.cpp](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/6aec6f3a842ead30b26cd31dc57a2ab268f67875/src/hotspot/share/ci/ciField.cpp#L219). Does it affect the execution performance of MethodHandle in hidden classes' Condy vs. MethodHandle in regular final field in hidden classes?
>>
>> [^1]: single abstract method
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Whitespace, cleanup, rename benchmarks to be informative
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandleProxies.java line 284:
> 282: return type.getDeclaredAnnotation(WrapperInstance.class);
> 283: }
> 284: }) : type.getDeclaredAnnotation(WrapperInstance.class);
This may introduce a security vulnerability:
@AnnotationTest.ClassHolder(sun.misc.Unsafe.class)
public class AnnotationTest {
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@interface ClassHolder {
Class<?> value();
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws PrivilegedActionException {
MethodHandleProxies.isWrapperInstance(new AnnotationTest());
System.out.println(AnnotationTest.class.getDeclaredAnnotation(ClassHolder.class).value());
}
}
Don't parse annotations in a privileged context.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13197#discussion_r1159989152
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list