RFR: 8304450: [vectorapi] Refactor VectorShuffle implementation [v6]

[Quan Anh Mai]

On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 15:16:59 GMT, Jatin Bhateja <jbhateja at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Yes I think it is a drawback of this approach, however currently we do not support shuffling for 256-bit vectors on AVX1 machines either, and AVX1 seems to be a special case in this regard. This species of float and double may also be less common in the usage of Vector API since it is larger than SPECIES_PREFERRED.
>
> Hi @merykitty , Agree with you that SPECIES_PREFERRED is preferred for vector algorithms intercepting both integral and floating point vectors.
> 
> FTR, we see a perf regression with Float256 based micro now on AVX=1 targets,
> 
> 
>   public static short micro() {
>      VectorShuffle<Float> iota = FloatVector.SPECIES_256.iotaShuffle(0, 1, true);
>      return iota.cast(ShortVector.SPECIES_128).toVector().reinterpretAsShorts().lane(1);
>   }
> 
> CPROMPT>javad --add-modules=jdk.incubator.vector -XX:UseAVX=1 -XX:+PrintIntrinsics -XX:CompileCommand=compileonly,shufflef::micro -cp . shufflef
> CompileCommand: compileonly shufflef.micro bool compileonly = true
>   ** not supported: arity=1 op=reinterpret/1 vlen1=8 etype1=int ismask=0
>   ** not supported: arity=1 op=cast/1 vlen1=8 etype1=int ismask=0
>                                     @ 17   java.lang.Object::getClass (0 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                     @ 24   java.lang.Object::getClass (0 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                     @ 45   jdk.internal.vm.vector.VectorSupport::convert (36 bytes)   failed to inline (intrinsic)
>                                   @ 34   java.lang.Object::getClass (0 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                   @ 54   jdk.internal.vm.vector.VectorSupport::convert (36 bytes)   failed to inline (intrinsic)
>                                     @ 17   java.lang.Object::getClass (0 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                     @ 24   java.lang.Object::getClass (0 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                     @ 45   jdk.internal.vm.vector.VectorSupport::convert (36 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                       @ 292   java.lang.Object::getClass (0 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                       @ 298   java.lang.Object::getClass (0 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                       @ 322   jdk.internal.vm.vector.VectorSupport::convert (36 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                       @ 292   java.lang.Object::getClass (0 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                       @ 298   java.lang.Object::getClass (0 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                       @ 322   jdk.internal.vm.vector.VectorSupport::convert (36 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                 @ 16   jdk.internal.vm.vector.VectorSupport::extract (35 bytes)   (intrinsic)
> [time] 386ms  [res]3392
> CPROMPT>export JAVA_HOME=/home/jatinbha/softwares/jdk-20/
> CPROMPT>export PATH=$JAVA_HOME/bin:$PATH
> CPROMPT>javad --add-modules=jdk.incubator.vector -XX:UseAVX=1 -XX:+PrintIntrinsics -XX:CompileCommand=compileonly,shufflef::micro -cp . shufflef
> CompileCommand: compileonly shufflef.micro bool compileonly = true
> WARNING: Using incubator modules: jdk.incubator.vector
>                                       @ 3   jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe::loadFence (5 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                         @ 3   jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe::loadFence (5 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                 @ 17   jdk.internal.vm.vector.VectorSupport::shuffleToVector (33 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                       @ 292   java.lang.Object::getClass (0 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                       @ 298   java.lang.Object::getClass (0 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                       @ 322   jdk.internal.vm.vector.VectorSupport::convert (36 bytes)   (intrinsic)
>                                 @ 16   jdk.internal.vm.vector.VectorSupport::extract (35 bytes)   (intrinsic)
> [time] 7ms  [res]3392

I see, what do you think?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13093#discussion_r1161994748