RFR: 8303431: [JVMCI] libgraal annotation API [v9]

[Doug Simon]

On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 07:27:47 GMT, Doug Simon <dnsimon at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR extends JVMCI with new API (`jdk.vm.ci.meta.Annotated`) for accessing annotations. The main differences from `java.lang.reflect.AnnotatedElement` are:
>> * All methods in the `Annotated` interface explicitly specify requested annotation type(s). That is, there is no equivalent of `AnnotatedElement.getAnnotations()`.
>> * Annotation data is returned in a map-like object (of type `jdk.vm.ci.meta.AnnotationData`) instead of in an `Annotation` object. This works better for libgraal as it avoids the need for annotation types to be loaded and included in libgraal.
>>  
>> To demonstrate the new API, here's an example in terms `java.lang.reflect.AnnotatedElement` (which `ResolvedJavaType` implements):
>> 
>>     ResolvedJavaMethod method = ...;
>>     ExplodeLoop a = method.getAnnotation(ExplodeLoop.class);
>>     return switch (a.kind()) {
>>         case FULL_UNROLL -> LoopExplosionKind.FULL_UNROLL;
>>         case FULL_UNROLL_UNTIL_RETURN -> LoopExplosionKind.FULL_UNROLL_UNTIL_RETURN;
>>         ...
>>     }
>> 
>> 
>> The same code using the new API:
>> 
>> 
>>     ResolvedJavaMethod method = ...;
>>     ResolvedJavaType explodeLoopType = ...;
>>     AnnotationData a = method.getAnnotationDataFor(explodeLoopType);
>>     return switch (a.getEnum("kind").getName()) {
>>         case "FULL_UNROLL" -> LoopExplosionKind.FULL_UNROLL;
>>         case "FULL_UNROLL_UNTIL_RETURN" -> LoopExplosionKind.FULL_UNROLL_UNTIL_RETURN;
>>         ...
>>     }
>> 
>> 
>> The implementation relies on new methods in `jdk.internal.vm.VMSupport` for parsing annotations and serializing/deserializing to/from a byte array. This allows the annotation data to be passed from the HotSpot heap to the libgraal heap.
>
> Doug Simon has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - added breadcrumb in AnnotationParser about considering JVMCI should new annotation element types be added
>  - fixed javadoc comment

Thanks for the reviews @turbanoff , @vnkozlov and @jddarcy.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12810#issuecomment-1514985140