RFR: 8306461: ObjectInputStream::readObject() should handle negative array sizes without throwing NegativeArraySizeExceptions
Volker Simonis
simonis at openjdk.org
Wed Apr 19 16:56:59 UTC 2023
This issue was reported by: Yakov Shafranovich ([yakovsh at amazon.com](mailto:yakovsh at amazon.com))
Currently, `ObjectInputStream::readObject()` doesn't explicitly checks for a negative array length in the deserialization stream. Instead it calls `j.l.r.Array::newInstance(..)` with the negative length which results in a `NegativeArraySizeException`. NegativeArraySizeException is an unchecked exception which is neither declared in the signature of `ObjectInputStream::readObject()` nor mentioned in its API specification. It is therefore not obvious for users of `ObjectInputStream::readObject()` that they may have to handle `NegativeArraySizeException`s. It would therefor be better if a negative array length in the deserialization stream would be automatically wrapped in an `InvalidClassException` which is a checked exception (derived from `IOException` via `ObjectStreamException`) and declared in the signature of `ObjectInputStream::readObject()`.
If we do the negative array length check in `ObjectInputStream::readObject()` before filtering, this will then also fix `ObjectInputFilter.FilterInfo::arrayLength()` which is defined as:
Returns:
the non-negative number of array elements when deserializing an array of the class, otherwise -1
but currently returns a negative value if the array length is negative.
-------------
Commit messages:
- 8306461: ObjectInputStream::readObject() should handle negative array sizes without throwing NegativeArraySizeExceptions
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13540/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=13540&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8306461
Stats: 115 lines in 2 files changed: 114 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13540.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13540/head:pull/13540
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13540
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list