RFR: 8319463: ClassSignature should have superclass and superinterfaces as ClassTypeSig [v2]
Chen Liang
liach at openjdk.org
Mon Dec 4 15:23:07 UTC 2023
> Discovered while writing a test for #16513 that `ClassSignature.superclassSignature()` does not return a `ClassTypeSig`, yet [JVM Spec](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se21/html/jvms-4.html#jvms-4.7.9.1-4100) requires it to be one. This patch adds such a requirement to the accessors, factories, and the parsing logic.
Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
- Merge branch 'master' into feature/class-signature-elements
- 8319463: ClassSignature should have superclass and superinterfaces as ClassTypeSig
-------------
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16514/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16514/files/77464793..3db563c6
Webrevs:
- full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=16514&range=01
- incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=16514&range=00-01
Stats: 718541 lines in 3208 files changed: 139028 ins; 508573 del; 70940 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16514.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16514/head:pull/16514
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16514
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list