RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names
David M. Lloyd
duke at openjdk.org
Wed Feb 15 20:28:54 UTC 2023
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:32:38 GMT, David M. Lloyd <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
> The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, this also impacts build reproducibility for native image generators which might already have a strategy to cope with hidden classes but cannot cope with indeterminate definition order for lambda proxy classes.
>
> This solves JDK-8292914 by making lambda proxy names always be stable without any configuration needed. This would also replace #10024.
Sure, that's fine. I think debugging is a totally valid consideration; in fact it might be nice to have a broader facility for dumping of any hidden class (maybe that's what you are alluding to). But if you think it's best to wait then I won't pursue it further at this time.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12579
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list