RFR: 8302315: Examine cost of clone of primitive arrays compared to arraycopy
David Schlosnagle
duke at openjdk.org
Sat Feb 18 01:43:24 UTC 2023
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:58:54 GMT, Claes Redestad <redestad at openjdk.org> wrote:
> During work on #12453 @schlosna reported that `array.clone()` might underperform `System.arraycopy` in microbenchmarks and I opted to go with `arraycopy` throughout while investigating.
>
> Testing on x86 (SandyBridge, AVX2) I observe no difference at all between the setups. On aarch the only difference I can observe is that arraycopy seem curiously slow for input size = 0, otherwise no statistically significant difference. All tests ran on builds from JDK mainline and 21-b9.
>
> Since the reported difference was small and mostly visible on very large arrays I conclude that the maintainability win we get from using `clone()` is preferable. I've added the microbenchmark provided by @schlosna here.
Marked as reviewed by schlosna at github.com (no known OpenJDK username).
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12613
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list