RFR: 8292914: Drop the counter from lambda class names [v10]

David M. Lloyd duke at openjdk.org
Mon Feb 27 14:35:14 UTC 2023


On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:16:51 GMT, David M. Lloyd <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The class generated for lambda proxies is now defined as a hidden class. This means that the counter, which was used to ensure a unique class name and avoid clashes, is now redundant. In addition to performing redundant work, this also impacts build reproducibility for native image generators which might already have a strategy to cope with hidden classes but cannot cope with indeterminate definition order for lambda proxy classes.
>> 
>> This solves JDK-8292914 by making lambda proxy names always be stable without any configuration needed. This would also replace #10024.
>
> David M. Lloyd has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Remove final keyword

Ah, I see there's an integration blocker because the bug doesn't match the title of the PR.

Should I:

* Open a new bug and change the PR title
* Change the PR title to (inaccurately IMO) match the title of the bug
* Change the bug summary to match the PR
* Something else?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12579


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list