Integrated: 8258776: ThreadLocal#initialValue() Javadoc is unaware of ThreadLocal#withInitial()

[Jaikiran Pai]

On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 14:37:13 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <jpai at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Can I please get a review of this doc only change which addresses the javadoc issue noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8258776? 
> 
> As noted in that issue, the `ThreadLocal.initialValue()` API javadoc suggests subclassing `ThreadLocal` and overriding the `initialValue()` method instead of recommending the `withInitial` method that was added in Java 8.
> 
> The commit here updates the javadoc of `initialValue()` method to note that `withInitial` method is available for use if the programmer wants to provide an initial value. The updated javadoc continues to note that the `ThreadLocal` can be subclassed and the method overriden as the other way of providing an initial value. This change now uses the `@implSpec` construct to state this default behaviour of the `initialValue()` method.
> 
> Additionally, the `get()` method's javadoc has also been updated to account for the semantics of `initialValue()`. In fact, in its current form, before the changes in this PR, the `get()` method states:
> 
>> If the current thread does not support thread locals then
>> this method returns its {@link #initialValue} (or {@code null}
>> if the {@code initialValue} method is not overridden).
> 
> which isn't accurate, since the `get()` will return a non-null value if the ThreadLocal was constructed through `ThreadLocal.withInitial`. Here's a trivial code which contradicts this current javadoc:
> 
> 
> public class Test {
>   public static void main(final String[] args) throws Exception {
>     Thread.ofPlatform().name("hello").allowSetThreadLocals(false).start(() -> {
> 	var t = ThreadLocal.withInitial(() -> 2);
> 	System.out.println("Thread local value is " + t.get());
>     });
>   }
> }
> 
> Running this with `java --enable-preview --source 21 Test.java` returns:
> 
> Thread local value is 2
> 
> 
> The updated javadoc of `get()` in this PR now matches the behaviour of this method. I believe this will need a CSR, which I'll open once we have an agreement on these changes.
> 
> Furthermore, the class level javadoc of `ThreadLocal` has an example of providing an initial value which uses the subclassing strategy. I haven't updated that part. Should we update that to show the `withInitialValue` usage instead (and maybe convert it to a snippet)?

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: e209693a
Author:    Jaikiran Pai <jpai at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/e209693a37e49ba5fd5b1ad3404e9dd807c545f3
Stats:     10 lines in 1 file changed: 3 ins; 1 del; 6 mod

8258776: ThreadLocal#initialValue() Javadoc is unaware of ThreadLocal#withInitial()

Reviewed-by: alanb

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11846