RFR: 8291065: Creating a VarHandle for a static field triggers class initialization [v19]

Mandy Chung mchung at openjdk.org
Tue Jul 11 18:52:12 UTC 2023


On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 01:55:30 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This patch implements lazy initialization for VarHandle working on static fields. It has a good initial call performance.
>> 
>> We introduce a new internal API, `target()` to unpack a lazy VarHandle in VH implementation methods. If called via MethodHandle, a barrier is added in the MethodHandle instead.
>> 
>> The new test ensures the correctness of Lazy VH for both direct and indirect invocation; the performance of MethodHandle version of lazy VH is not yet tested.
>> 
>> 
>> Benchmark                                            Mode  Cnt    Score    Error  Units
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleCreateEager            ss   10   41.490 ± 12.331  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleCreateLazy             ss   10   21.810 ± 16.964  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleInitializeCallEager    ss   10   57.860 ± 13.738  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleInitializeCallLazy     ss   10   93.300 ± 18.858  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleCreateEager               ss   10   39.860 ±  9.362  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleCreateLazy                ss   10   17.630 ±  1.111  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleInitializeCallEager       ss   10  123.170 ± 62.468  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleInitializeCallLazy        ss   10  105.390 ± 41.815  us/op
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 33 commits:
> 
>  - Run Lazy test with all flags, Classfile and comment update to ColdStart, other minor cleanup
>  - Merge branch 'master' into lazy-static-varhandle
>  - Mandy suggestions
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Mandy Chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com>
>  - Comment update from mandy
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Mandy Chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com>
>  - Add lazy init test for toMethodHandle
>  - Apply suggestions from code review
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Paul Sandoz <paul.d.sandoz at googlemail.com>
>  - Rollback VHG changes
>  - Split the concepts of asDirect and target
>  - Fix bugs
>  - Merge branch 'master' into lazy-static-varhandle
>  - ... and 23 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ded13707...6e54b61d

yes, go ahead.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13821#issuecomment-1631343955


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list