RFR: 8310843: Reimplement ByteArray and ByteArrayLittleEndian with Unsafe [v10]

[Glavo]

On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:34:33 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadamore at openjdk.org> wrote:

> > it's likely to introduce non-trivial additional overhead
> 
> What do you mean? E.g. where would the overhead come from?

You suggested changes stored the ByteBuffer into a field. I measured throughput with JMH, and it shows that using ByteBuffer like this results in over 50% drop in throughput.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14636#discussion_r1269653896