RFR: 8291065: Creating a VarHandle for a static field triggers class initialization [v7]
Chen Liang
liach at openjdk.org
Sat Jun 3 01:02:08 UTC 2023
On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 00:16:23 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Also fixed the bug with NPE in `IndirectVarHandle::isAccessModeSupported`.
>>
>> A few implementation-detail methods in VarHandle are now documented with the implied constraints to avoid subtle problems in the future. Changed `IndirectVarHandle` to call `asDirect` lazily to accomodate the lazy VarHandle changes. Also changed VarHandleBaseTest to report the whole incorrect type of exception caught than swallow it and leaving only a message.
>>
>> Current problems:
>> - [ ] The lazy var handle is quite slow on the first invocation.
>> - As seen in the benchmark, users can first call `Lookup::ensureInitialized` to create an eager handle.
>> - After that, the lazy handle has a performance on par with the regular var handle.
>> - [ ] The class-loading-based test is not in a unit test
>> - The test frameworks don't seem to offer fine-grained control for class-loading detection or reliable unloading
>>
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> VarHandleLazyStaticInvocation.initializedInvocation avgt 30 12.668 ± 0.069 ns/op
>> VarHandleLazyStaticInvocation.lazyInvocation avgt 30 12.683 ± 0.069 ns/op
>>
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleCreateEager ss 10 50.980 ± 9.454 us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleCreateLazy ss 10 24.350 ± 6.701 us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleInitializeCallEager ss 10 65.140 ± 7.552 us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleInitializeCallLazy ss 10 118.360 ± 20.320 us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleCreateEager ss 10 49.500 ± 4.277 us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleCreateLazy ss 10 26.690 ± 5.157 us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleInitializeCallEager ss 10 87.930 ± 12.643 us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleInitializeCallLazy ss 10 1057.120 ± 189.810 us/op
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Remove lazy init of MH, for all invocation of the Lazy VH needs this MH
Yeah, I was referring the performance drop from 0.5ns/op to 12ns/op for botg direct and indirect; don't know what caused the problems of general slowdown on my end.
Also, is there anything I can do to fix the windows build failures?
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13821#issuecomment-1574509072
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list