RFR: 8308609: java/lang/ScopedValue/StressStackOverflow.java fails with "-XX:-VMContinuations"
Alan Bateman
alanb at openjdk.org
Sat Jun 10 18:52:40 UTC 2023
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 16:53:15 GMT, Andrew Haley <aph at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Move `runWith()` from `VirtualThread` to `BaseVirtualThread`.
>
> `BoundVirtualThread` does not use `runWith()` to run its task, so when a VM error occurs it can not recover scoped values.
>
> Moving `runWith()` into the common subclass of both `VirtualThread` and `BoundVirtualThread` fixes the problem.
One suggestion for the test is to have it re-run with -XX:-VMContinuations on platforms/ports that do do have VM continuations support. Some of the tests for virtual threads do the same thing to ensure this operating mode is tested. This should do it:
--- a/test/jdk/java/lang/ScopedValue/StressStackOverflow.java
+++ b/test/jdk/java/lang/ScopedValue/StressStackOverflow.java
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@
* questions.
*/
-/**
- * @test
+/*
+ * @test id=default
* @summary StressStackOverflow the recovery path for ScopedValue
* @enablePreview
* @run main/othervm/timeout=300 -XX:-TieredCompilation StressStackOverflow
@@ -30,6 +30,13 @@
* @run main/othervm/timeout=300 StressStackOverflow
*/
+/*
+ * @test id=no-vmcontinuations
+ * @requires vm.continuations
+ * @enablePreview
+ * @run main/othervm/timeout=300 -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:-VMContinuations StressStackOverflow
+ */
+
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14399#issuecomment-1585769878
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list