RFR: 8309819: Clarify API note in Class::getName and MethodType::toMethodDescriptorString [v5]
Alan Bateman
alanb at openjdk.org
Thu Jun 15 10:04:05 UTC 2023
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 02:38:08 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The API specification for descriptorString not being a strict inverse of Class::forName and MethodType::fromDescriptorString are not entirely correct.
>>
>> 1. Class::descriptorString was never an inverse of Class::forName, which takes a binary name instead. Class::getName was a partial inverse instead.
>> 2. MethodType::toMethodDescriptorString ends with a meaningless sentence: "fromMethodDescriptorString, because the latter requires a suitable class loader argument.", and the "Note:" section can be replaced with an `@apiNote`.
>> 3. Both of these didn't mention hidden classes (or other non-nominally-describable classes) as a reason that prevents the inversion operation, in addition to distinct classloaders.
>>
>> A few user-defined anchor links are replaced with updated javadoc link tag format as well. The explicit html-style links in `@see` tags are unchanged in order to retain the non-code output.
>>
>> The rendered specifications:
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/8309819/04/java.base/java/lang/Class.html
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/8309819/04/java.base/java/lang/invoke/MethodType.html
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Update the note for getName
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodType.java line 1172:
> 1170: * It is possible to encounter method types which cannot be
> 1171: * constructed by this method, because their component types are
> 1172: * not all reachable from a common class loader, or some component types
"reachable from a common class loader" pre-dates your change but I think it should say visible to the given class loader.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodType.java line 1233:
> 1231: * (JVMS {@jvms 4.3.3}) and a suitable class loader argument. Two distinct
> 1232: * classes which share a common name but have different class loaders will
> 1233: * appear identical when viewed within descriptor strings.
"will appear identical when viewed within descriptor strings". Would it be clearer to say that have equal descriptor strings?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14411#discussion_r1230764171
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14411#discussion_r1230766963
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list