RFR: JDK-8310267: Javadoc for Class#isPrimitive() is incorrect regarding Class objects for primitives

[Joe Darcy]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:13:24 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Correct misstatement that the Class object for a primitive type can only be be access via fields like java.lang.Integer.TYPE.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java line 818:
> 
>> 816:      * they represent, namely {@code boolean}, {@code byte},
>> 817:      * {@code char}, {@code short}, {@code int},
>> 818:      * {@code long}, {@code float}, and {@code double}.
> 
> Should we add `{@code void}` to the list here, as this is one of the primitive type names?

Hmm. I'll consider that. The javadoc in java.lang.Class is inconsistent in the formatting of "void" as a type name, some instances are in code markup while others are not.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14574#discussion_r1236032594