RFR: 8308899: Introduce Classfile.Context and improve Classfile.Option(s) [v21]
Chen Liang
liach at openjdk.org
Wed Jun 21 08:10:17 UTC 2023
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:22:32 GMT, Adam Sotona <asotona at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Classfile context object and multi-state options have been discussed at https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/classfile-api-dev/2023-May/000321.html
>> This patch implements the proposed changes in Classfile API and fixes all affected code across JDK sources and tests.
>>
>> Please review.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Adam
>
> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> ClassfileBenchmark::transformWithNewMaps changed to transformWithAddedNOP
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/Classfile.java line 57:
> 55:
> 56: /**
> 57: * {@return a new context with default options}
Suggestion:
* {@return a context with default options}
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/Classfile.java line 272:
> 270: /**
> 271: * Build a classfile into a file using the provided constant pool
> 272: * builder (which encapsulates classfile processing options.)
The CP is now simply a data holder; it no longer holds the processing options. Same update is needed for the other few build methods taking a CP instance.
Suggestion:
* builder.
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/Classfile.java line 340:
> 338: *
> 339: * @implNote
> 340: * <p>This method behaves as if:
Suggestion:
* This method behaves as if:
Redundant break
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/Classfile.java line 343:
> 341: * {@snippet lang=java :
> 342: * Classfile.of().build(thisClass(), ConstantPoolBuilder.of(this),
> 343: * b -> b.transform(this, transform));
Suggestion:
* this.build(model.thisClass(), ConstantPoolBuilder.of(model),
* b -> b.transform(model, transform));
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14180#discussion_r1236575941
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14180#discussion_r1236572387
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14180#discussion_r1236548304
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14180#discussion_r1236570476
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list