RFR: 8291065: Creating a VarHandle for a static field triggers class initialization [v16]

Mandy Chung mchung at openjdk.org
Wed Jun 28 00:18:09 UTC 2023


On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:13:48 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This patch implements lazy initialization for VarHandle working on static fields. It has a good initial call performance.
>> 
>> We introduce a new internal API, `target()` to unpack a lazy VarHandle in VH implementation methods. If called via MethodHandle, a barrier is added in the MethodHandle instead.
>> 
>> The new test ensures the correctness of Lazy VH for both direct and indirect invocation; the performance of MethodHandle version of lazy VH is not yet tested.
>> 
>> 
>> Benchmark                                            Mode  Cnt    Score    Error  Units
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleCreateEager            ss   10   41.490 ± 12.331  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleCreateLazy             ss   10   21.810 ± 16.964  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleInitializeCallEager    ss   10   57.860 ± 13.738  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleInitializeCallLazy     ss   10   93.300 ± 18.858  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleCreateEager               ss   10   39.860 ±  9.362  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleCreateLazy                ss   10   17.630 ±  1.111  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleInitializeCallEager       ss   10  123.170 ± 62.468  us/op
>> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleInitializeCallLazy        ss   10  105.390 ± 41.815  us/op
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add lazy init test for toMethodHandle

Good work!   I try to see how to improve the documentation to help readers to understand.  See if the suggestion helps.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13821#pullrequestreview-1501913896


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list