RFR: 6983726: Reimplement MethodHandleProxies.asInterfaceInstance [v19]
Mandy Chung
mchung at openjdk.org
Fri Jun 30 21:45:14 UTC 2023
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 03:16:15 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues:
>> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance interface)
>> 2. Does not allow future expansion to support SAM[^1] abstract classes
>> 3. Slow (in fact, very slow)
>>
>> This patch addresses all 3 problems:
>> 1. It updates the WrapperInstance methods to take an `Empty` to avoid method clashes
>> 2. This patch obtains already generated classes from a ClassValue by the requested interface type; the ClassValue can later be updated to compute implementation generation for abstract classes as well.
>> 3. This patch's faster than old implementation in general.
>>
>> Benchmark for revision 17:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstance.baselineAllocCompute avgt 15 1.503 ± 0.021 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstance.baselineCompute avgt 15 0.269 ± 0.005 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstance.testCall avgt 15 1.806 ± 0.018 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstance.testCreate avgt 15 17.332 ± 0.210 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstance.testCreateCall avgt 15 19.296 ± 1.371 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstanceCall.callDoable avgt 5 0.419 ± 0.004 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstanceCall.callHandle avgt 5 0.421 ± 0.004 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstanceCall.callInterfaceInstance avgt 5 1.731 ± 0.018 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstanceCall.callLambda avgt 5 0.418 ± 0.003 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstanceCall.constantDoable avgt 5 0.263 ± 0.003 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstanceCall.constantHandle avgt 5 0.262 ± 0.002 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstanceCall.constantInterfaceInstance avgt 5 0.262 ± 0.002 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstanceCall.constantLambda avgt 5 0.267 ± 0.019 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstanceCall.direct avgt 5 0.266 ± 0.013 ns/op
>> MethodHandleProxiesAsIFInstanceCreate.createCallInterfaceInstance avgt 5 18.057 ± 0.182 ...
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 41 commits:
>
> - Code cleanup, thanks mandy!
> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into explore/mhp-iface
> - 1. Change WRAPPER_TYPES to WeakHashMap to accurately determine if the given class is
> the proxy class
>
> Discussion:
> 2. I dropped ProxyClassInfo and use Lookup just to see the simplication.
> If wrapperInstanceTarget and wrapperInstanceType are frequently called, it makes
> sense to cache the method handles.
>
> 3. Should it use SoftReference or WeakReference? It depends if asInterfaceInstance
> will be used heavily.
>
> 3. I also dropped SamInfo and getStats as it can be inlined in the caller, which
> I think it's clearer to see what it does in place.
> - SecurityManager fixed, minimize changes
> - Merge branch 'master' into explore/mhp-iface
> - Some changes per Mandy's review. SecurityManager test fails in this patch
> - Merge branch 'master' into explore/mhp-iface
> - Merge branch 'master' into explore/mhp-iface
> - Merge branch 'master' into explore/mhp-iface
> - stage, needs to fix is mh proxy instance check
> - ... and 31 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/6f58ab2b...340b0751
Also we should have a test to verify the proxy class is unloaded and a new proxy class is re-generated when `asInterfaceInstance` is called again on the same interface.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13197#issuecomment-1615220474
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list