ZipOutputStream & directories
Eirik Bjørsnøs
eirbjo at gmail.com
Mon Mar 6 18:43:15 UTC 2023
Hi,
I noticed that ZipOutputStream violates APPNOTE.txt when writing directory
entries:
Zero-byte files, directories, and other file types that
> contain no content MUST NOT include file data.
Nobody seems to have complained about this violation (I searched JBS), so
in itself it might not be worth pursuing a fix. However, in addition to
breaking the specification, this also causes suboptimal performance both on
the write and read paths.
Before I go ahead and suggest any particular solution, I wanted to share
some analysis:
ZipOutputStream writes directories as any other entry, so by default it
ends up writing a LOC header with the DEFLATED method and the data
descriptor bit set. This is followed by a final, empty DEFLATE block
(0x0300) and then a signed data descriptor with the CRC, csize (2) and size
(0), each 4 bytes:
------ Local File Header ------
000000 signature 0x04034b50
000004 version 20
000006 flags 0x0808
000008 method 8 Deflated
000010 time 0x9812 19:00:36
000012 date 0x5666 2023-03-06
000014 crc 0x00000000
000018 csize 0
000022 size 0
000026 nlen 9
000028 elen 0
000030 name 9 bytes 'META-INF/'
------ File Data ------
000039 data 2 bytes
------ Data Descriptor ------
000041 signature 0x08074b50
000045 crc 0x00000000
000049 csize 2
000053 size 0
In total, this means that an extra 18 bytes is output, which is a waste of
storage space and IO cycles while writing and reading/parsing the
unnecessary headers and data. If the directory entry has the STORED method
and the sizes and crc is set to 0, then the file data and data descriptors
are skipped and we reclaim 18 bytes.
The use of DEFLATE has an adverse negative impact on performance, since
native ZLIB code needs to be called to produce and read (in ZipInputStream)
the empty DEFLATE block. Worse, Deflater.reset and Inflater.reset are
called, which seems to incur a significant overhead.
In fact, when configuring the STORED method and explicitly setting csize,
size and crc to 0, we see considerable benchmark improvements writing and
reading directory entries:
DEFLATED:
Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
ZipEmptyStreams.readDirStream 512 avgt 15 0.278 ± 0.005 ms/op
ZipEmptyStreams.readDirStream 1024 avgt 15 0.550 ± 0.006 ms/op
ZipEmptyStreams.writeDirStreams 512 avgt 15 2.379 ± 0.043 ms/op
ZipEmptyStreams.writeDirStreams 1024 avgt 15 4.845 ± 0.087 ms/op
STORED:
Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
ZipEmptyStreams.readDirStream 512 avgt 15 0.082 ± 0.001 ms/op
ZipEmptyStreams.readDirStream 1024 avgt 15 0.176 ± 0.015 ms/op
ZipEmptyStreams.writeDirStream 512 avgt 15 0.233 ± 0.021 ms/op
ZipEmptyStreams.writeDirStream 1024 avgt 15 0.460 ± 0.028 ms/op
Possible actions:
- Do nothing: Nobody complained so far, so if is ain't broke, don't fix it.
- Update Javadocs of ZipInputStream.putNextEntry to recommend that users
should use STORED and configure sizes & crc for directory entries for
correctness and performance
- Change the default compression method for directories to STORED and set
sizes & crc to 0. This would add the risk of changing behavior of existing
code.
For context, 7% of entries in the dependencies of Spring Petclinic are
directories.
Any thoughts or input?
Thanks,
Eirik.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/attachments/20230306/05912b22/attachment.htm>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list