RFR: 8291966: SwitchBootstrap.typeSwitch could be faster [v2]
Rémi Forax
forax at openjdk.org
Tue May 2 14:00:27 UTC 2023
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:55:40 GMT, Jan Lahoda <jlahoda at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The pattern matching switches are using a bootstrap method `SwitchBootstrap.typeSwitch` to implement the jumps in the switch. Basically, for a switch like:
>>
>> switch (obj) {
>> case String s when s.isEmpty() -> {}
>> case String s -> {}
>> case CharSequence cs -> {}
>> ...
>> }
>>
>>
>> this method will produce a MethodHandle that will be analyze the provided selector value (`obj` in the example), and will return the case index to which the switch should jump. This method also accepts a (re)start index for the search, which is used to handle guards. For example, if the `s.isEmpty()` guard in the above sample returns false, the matching is restarted on the next case.
>>
>> The current implementation is fairly slow, it basically goes through the labels in a loop. The proposal here is to replace that with a MethodHandle structure like this:
>>
>> obj == null ? -1
>> : switch (restartIndex) {
>> case 0 -> obj instanceof String ? 0 : obj instanceof CharSequence ? 2 : ... ;
>> case 1 -> obj instanceof String ? 1 : obj instanceof CharSequence ? 2 : ... ;
>> case 2 -> obj instanceof CharSequence ? 2 : ... ;
>> ...
>> default -> <labels-count>;
>> }
>>
>>
>> This appear to run faster than the current implementation, using testcase similar to the one used for https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/9746 , these are the results
>>
>> PatternsOptimizationTest.testLegacyIndyLongSwitch thrpt 25 1515989.562 ± 32047.918 ops/s
>> PatternsOptimizationTest.testHandleIndyLongSwitch thrpt 25 2630707.585 ± 37202.210 ops/s
>>
>> PatternsOptimizationTest.testLegacyIndyShortSwitch thrpt 25 6789310.900 ± 61921.636 ops/s
>> PatternsOptimizationTest.testHandleIndyShortSwitch thrpt 25 10771729.464 ± 69607.467 ops/s
>>
>>
>> The "LegacyIndy" is the current implementation, "HandleIndy" is the one proposed here. The translation in javac used is the one from #9746 in all cases.
>
> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Adding comments
> - Improving performance
> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8291966
> - 8291966: SwitchBootstrap.typeSwitch could be faster
Also there is a lot of use cases where the type switch is called only with instances of the same class, for those scenarii, the VM should be able to fully remove the type switch and inline the body of the corresponding case like this is done with a virtual call.
I don't think there is a way currently to explain to the VM that the a hash map really acts as a cache so if the key is a constant then the value is a constant too (this optimization is also missing when JITing ClassValue.get()).
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9779#issuecomment-1531526385
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list