RFR: 8305990: Stripping debug info of ASM 9.5 fails [v13]
Adam Sotona
asotona at openjdk.org
Tue May 9 12:17:25 UTC 2023
On Tue, 9 May 2023 11:59:08 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadamore at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Adam Sotona has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 16 additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - fixed StackCounter
>> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8305990-debug-info-strip-fail
>> - implemented failover stackmap generation for class version 50
>> fixed StackMapGenerator error debug print + added clone constructor to SplitConstantPool
>> adjusted and extended related tests
>> - Apply suggestions from code review
>>
>> Thanks for review.
>>
>> Co-authored-by: liach <7806504+liach at users.noreply.github.com>
>> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8305990-debug-info-strip-fail
>> - Update StackCounter.java
>> - added comments to StackCounter about maxStack upper bounds calculation for JSR/RET instructions
>> - fixed stack counting of JSR instructions
>> - implemented StackCounter
>> - Making some BufWriter fields final
>> - ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1302ccc8...5db0ed01
>
> Seems like GitHub UI does not let me add comments (as GitHub seems to be experiencing some issues). Here's what I added:
>
> * StackCounter: `stack` and `local` are different in spirit. One adds new stack slots. The other ensure there's at least enough local slots available. As such I'd suggest a renaming `addStackSlot` and `ensureLocalSlot`.
>
> * StackMapGeneration/DirectClassBuilder: the exception type seems a bit loose and we might end up catching more than is thrown by the stackmap generator.
@mcimadamore thanks for review.
I've fixed `stack` and `local`.
Exception consolidation is already a part of #11411 and this catch will be changed to `IAE` only. Actually it would have to catch `ISE`, `IAE`, `IOOBE` and probably also `NPE`.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13478#issuecomment-1540021763
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list