RFR: 8307535: java.util.logging.Handlers should be more VirtualThread friendly [v3]
Daniel Fuchs
dfuchs at openjdk.org
Thu May 11 07:55:46 UTC 2023
On Thu, 11 May 2023 07:51:12 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfuchs at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/java.logging/share/classes/java/util/logging/Handler.java line 88:
>>
>>> 86: return null;
>>> 87: } else {
>>> 88: return InternalLock.newLockOrNull();
>>
>> I'm surprised to see InternalLock used here. That class was created for the java.io area to avoid surprises when a subclass uses a RL as the lock object. I assume it's just convenience to use it here, that is, I don't think the internal lock is exposed to subclasses in the j.u.logging API.
>
> It's the same reason here: in these classes (and before that change) the lock is `this` which is always exposed to subclasses or external classes. If a handler uses `InternalLock`, and an external class `synchronize(handler)` that could cause surprising effects. My first take at this was simply using `new ReantrantLock()` but I thought it made sense to reuse `InternalLock` instead. After all, there would be no point in not using `synchronized` in StreamHandler if the underlying output stream is a PrintStream for which use of InternalLock has been disabled?
I can revert to using plain `ReentrantLock` if you think it's preferable.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13832#discussion_r1190772512
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list