[External] : Re: Classes used in method body are loaded lazily or eagerly depending on method return type

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu May 25 02:57:28 UTC 2023


On 25/05/2023 12:34 am, Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
> As mentioned in my previous email, if you move the member class 
> ChildClass out of TestLoading (out of the nest), and make it a top-level 
> class like
> 
>      public class ChildClass extends TestLoading.BaseClass {
>      }
> 
> and change
> 
>      URL classFileB = 
> TestLoading.class.getResource(TestLoading.class.getSimpleName() + 
> "$ChildClass.class");
> 
> to
> 
>      URL classFileB = 
> TestLoading.class.getResource(ChildClass.class.getSimpleName() + ".class");
> 
> rebuild everything and run, nothing is thrown.
> 
>      deleting: <path-to>/ChildClass.class
>      loading: TestLoading$ObjectReturner...
>      loading: TestLoading$BaseClassReturner...
> 
> I can't see any substantial difference, except that the nest rooted at 
> TestLoading lacks a member in the original setup and lacks nothing in 
> this setup.
> 
> What's an explanation for this difference?

Are you sure it actually deletes the file? What do you see when you 
enable class+load/init and verification logging?

David
-----



> 
> Greetings
> Raffaello
> 
> 
> On 2023-05-24 00:35, Remi Forax wrote:
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Holmes" <david.holmes at oracle.com>
>>> To: "Raffaello Giulietti" <raffaello.giulietti at oracle.com>, 
>>> "core-libs-dev" <core-libs-dev at openjdk.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 12:23:24 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Classes used in method body are loaded lazily or eagerly 
>>> depending on method return type
>>
>>> On 24/05/2023 12:50 am, Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
>>>> I think the problem here is that you are deleting a class in a nest.
>>>>
>>>> During the verification of BaseClassReturner.getObject(), access 
>>>> control
>>>> (JVMS, 5.4.4, second half) determines that the nest is broken, as
>>>> ChildClass is not present anymore.
>>>
>>> Not sure access control gets involved at this stage of the verification
>>> process. But in any case turning on logging does not show anything
>>> related to nestmates happening between BaseClass and ChildClass. It
>>> seems to just be the resolution of the return type during verification
>>> of the method, that causes the loading of ChildClass and the subsequent
>>> CNFE if it has been removed.
>>>
>>>> If you move ChildClass out of TestLoading so that it becomes a 
>>>> top-level
>>>> class extending TestLoading.BaseClass, and if you adapt the line that
>>>> initializes the local var classFileB to refer to the new location, the
>>>> code will not throw, despite ChildClass being deleted.
>>>
>>> My simplified test shows it still throws when verifying 
>>> BaseClassReturner.
>>
>> Nestmate checking is done lazily, so if you do not call a 
>> method/access a field of a nested class, the VM should not trigger a 
>> class loading.
>>
>> Moreover, if you test with Java 8 (nestmates were introduced in Java 
>> 11), it failed too.
>> That's another clue that the error is not related to nestmates checking.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> David
>>
>> regards,
>> Rémi
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Greetings
>>>> Raffaello
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2023-05-23 13:20, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> originally this question was asked here:
>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://stackoverflow.com/q/76260269/12473843__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Mb5nhj7EbuftWzF7s4GX9auUZZlyPyCUnLs64c4mkmSGJm4pw0CNgRzQR5wOYuApyE_kHSAnVxGyTM9PHz5StCppGw$ ,
>>>>> the code sample for reproduction will be put below or can be found via
>>>>> the link
>>>>>
>>>>> The issue is about eager/lazy loading of a class depending on method
>>>>> return type.
>>>>> If one runs the code below with Java 11-19 it will fail with
>>>>> NoClassDefFoundError (this is expected as delete class file for
>>>>> ChildClass):
>>>>>
>>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/example/TestLoading$ChildClass
>>>>>      at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
>>>>>      at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:390)
>>>>>      at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:381)
>>>>>      at org.example.TestLoading.loadMyClass(TestLoading.java:29)
>>>>>      at org.example.TestLoading.main(TestLoading.java:23)
>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>> org.example.TestLoading$ChildClass
>>>>>      at
>>>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:641)
>>>>>      at
>>>>> java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:188)
>>>>>      at 
>>>>> java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:521)
>>>>>      ... 5 more
>>>>>
>>>>> As of Java 20 chapter 12.4.1 of JLS states:
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> A class or interface T will be initialized immediately before the
>>>>> first occurrence of any one of the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> - T is a class and an instance of T is created.
>>>>> - a static method declared by T is invoked.
>>>>> - a static field declared by T is assigned.
>>>>> - a static field declared by T is used and the field is not a constant
>>>>> variable (§4.12.4).
>>>>>
>>>>> When a class is initialized, its superclasses are initialized (if they
>>>>> have not been previously initialized), as well as any superinterfaces
>>>>> (§8.1.5) that declare any default methods (§9.4.3) (if they have not
>>>>> been previously initialized).
>>>>> Initialization of an interface does not, of itself, cause
>>>>> initialization of any of its superinterfaces.
>>>>> A reference to a static field (§8.3.1.1) causes initialization of only
>>>>> the class or interface that actually declares it, even though it might
>>>>> be referred to through the name of a subclass, a subinterface, or a
>>>>> class that implements an interface.
>>>>> Invocation of certain reflective methods in class Class and in package
>>>>> java.lang.reflect also causes class or interface initialization.
>>>>> A class or interface will not be initialized under any other
>>>>> circumstance.
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> With the code snippet we see that calling
>>>>> Class.forName(ObjectReturner.class.getName()) succeeds and
>>>>> Class.forName(BaseClassReturner.class.getName()) fails even though
>>>>> both declare returning an instance of ChildClass.
>>>>> This failure is unexpected as in the code below we don't fulfill any
>>>>> requirement for class loading as of JLS 12.4.1, but the JVM still
>>>>> tries to load the class.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect it might be related to class file validation and/or
>>>>> security, because when we run the code with -Xlog:class+init there's a
>>>>> reference to LinkageError in loading log:
>>>>>
>>>>> loading: org.example.TestLoading$BaseClassReturner...
>>>>> [0.277s][info][class,init] Start class verification for:
>>>>> org.example.TestLoading$BaseClassReturner
>>>>> [0.277s][info][class,init] 771 Initializing
>>>>> 'java/lang/ReflectiveOperationException'(no method) 
>>>>> (0x0000000800004028)
>>>>> [0.277s][info][class,init] 772 Initializing
>>>>> 'java/lang/ClassNotFoundException'(no method) (0x0000000800004288)
>>>>> [0.277s][info][class,init] 773 Initializing
>>>>> 'java/lang/LinkageError'(no method)
>>>>> (0x00000008000044f8)                                  <----
>>>>> [0.277s][info][class,init] 774 Initializing
>>>>> 'java/lang/NoClassDefFoundError'(no method) (0x0000000800004758)
>>>>> [0.277s][info][class,init] Verification for
>>>>> org.example.TestLoading$BaseClassReturner has exception pending
>>>>> 'java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError org/example/TestLoading$ChildClass'
>>>>> [0.277s][info][class,init] End class verification for:
>>>>> org.example.TestLoading$BaseClassReturner
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So I've got three questions about this:
>>>>> - Does class loading depend on method's return type?
>>>>> - Which part of JLS/JVM spec describes eager class loading in this 
>>>>> case?
>>>>> - Could one point out the particular piece of the VM code responsible
>>>>> for class loading in this case?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Sergey Tsypanov
>>>>>
>>>>> Code snippet for reproduction:
>>>>>
>>>>> public class TestLoading {
>>>>>
>>>>>     public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
>>>>>       Class.forName(BaseClass.class.getName());
>>>>>       URL classFileB =
>>>>> TestLoading.class.getResource(TestLoading.class.getSimpleName() +
>>>>> "$ChildClass.class");
>>>>>       if (classFileB != null) {
>>>>>         if (!"file".equals(classFileB.getProtocol())) {
>>>>>           throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
>>>>>         }
>>>>>         Path path = new File(classFileB.getPath()).toPath();
>>>>>         System.out.println("deleting: " + path);
>>>>>         Files.delete(path);
>>>>>       }
>>>>>
>>>>>       loadMyClass(ObjectReturner.class.getName());
>>>>>       loadMyClass(BaseClassReturner.class.getName());
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>>     private static void loadMyClass(String name) {
>>>>>       System.out.println("loading: " + name + "...");
>>>>>       try {
>>>>>         Class.forName(name);
>>>>>       } catch (Throwable e) {
>>>>>         e.printStackTrace(System.out);
>>>>>       }
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>>     public static class BaseClass {
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>>     public static class ChildClass extends BaseClass {
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>>     public static class ObjectReturner {
>>>>>       public Object getObject() {
>>>>>         return new ChildClass();
>>>>>       }
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>>     public static class BaseClassReturner {
>>>>>       public BaseClass getObject() {
>>>>>         return new ChildClass();
>>>>>       }
>>>>>     }
>>>>> }


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list