RFR: 8316704: Regex-free parsing of Formatter and FormatProcessor specifiers
Shaojin Wen
duke at openjdk.org
Mon Oct 16 16:18:19 UTC 2023
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:46:36 GMT, Claes Redestad <redestad at openjdk.org> wrote:
> > The reason why I split it into multiple small methods is to avoid a single method codeSize > 325. After merging small methods, the performance will decrease.
>
> Yes, I can refactor to keep the same structure and verify performance is neutral or better. I can pick that up as a low-priority follow-up if you don't mind.
Thank you very much for your very patient review. I will be happy to see you make improvements. I see no slowdown in JMH, but I see slowdowns when I run the loop directly in the code. I am also confused. It may be that codeSize > 325 cannot be inline, which will cause some scenes to be slower.
import org.openjdk.jmh.infra.Blackhole;
public class StringFormatBench {
public static String s = "str";
public static int i = 17;
public static long l = 1234567L;
public static float f = 123.37f;
public void complexFormat(Blackhole bh) {
bh.consume("%3s %10d %4S %04X %4S %04X %4S %04X".formatted(s, i, s, i, s, i, s, i));
}
}
public class StringFormatBenchTest {
public static void complexFormat() throws Throwable {
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < 10_000_000; ++i) {
benchmark.complexFormat(BH);
}
long millis = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
System.out.println("StringFormatBench-complexFormat millis : " + millis);
// zulu8.58.0.13 :
// zulu11.52.13 :
// zulu17.38.21 :
// jdk22-ea : 4644
// jdk22-baseline : 16040
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Throwable {
complexFormat();
}
}
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15776#issuecomment-1733597301
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list