RFR: 8317993: Add capturing factories to classes in java.util.function package
Raffaello Giulietti
rgiulietti at openjdk.org
Tue Oct 17 13:04:18 UTC 2023
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:16:54 GMT, ExE Boss <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR proposes to add a number of "capturing factories" in classes in the `java.util.function` package.
>>
>> The PR additionally (an optionally) proposes to add a new function `UnaryOperator::andThenUnary` to allow composition while retaining the `UnaryOperator` type.
>>
>> With the new changes, it is possible to write code like this (example from `java.util.function.Function`):
>>
>>
>> // Resolve ambiguity
>> var function = Function.of(String::isEmpty); // Function<String, Boolean>
>> var predicate = Predicate.of(String::isEmpty); // Predicate<String>
>>
>> // Fluent composition
>> var chained = Function.of(String::length) // Function<String, Integer>
>> .andThen(Integer::byteValue); // Function<String, Byte>
>>
>>
>> Please see the original bug report for a comprehensive description of these proposed changes.
>>
>> Note: It is not the objective to promote `var` declaration or to prevent previous ways of capturing lambdas and method references. The comments in the code above is for explaining the binding and once that becomes obvious, such comments are likely to not appear in real code. Users that prefers having a normal type declaration can still do that.
>>
>> Note: Functional interfaces of primitives have not been considered (in this round). Otherwise, functional interfaces that might be ambiguous or that supports composition have been included. Hence, `Supplier` did not get a factory method.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/function/BiConsumer.java line 104:
>
>> 102: * @param <U> the type of the second argument to the operation
>> 103: */
>> 104: static <T, U> BiConsumer<T, U> of(BiConsumer<T, U> uncaptured) {
>
> Suggestion:
>
> static <T, U> BiConsumer<T, U> of(BiConsumer<? super T, ? super U> uncaptured) {
@ExE-Boss This and all other "enhancements" hardly compile ;-)
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16213#discussion_r1362076569
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list