RFR: 8316704: Regex-free parsing of Formatter and FormatProcessor specifiers
Shaojin Wen
duke at openjdk.org
Thu Oct 19 11:19:46 UTC 2023
On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:01:25 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti <rgiulietti at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> @cl4es made performance optimizations for the simple specifiers of String.format in PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/2830. Based on the same idea, I continued to make improvements. I made patterns like %2d %02d also be optimized.
>>
>> The following are the test results based on MacBookPro M1 Pro:
>>
>>
>> -Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> -StringFormat.complexFormat avgt 15 1862.233 ? 217.479 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.int02Format avgt 15 312.491 ? 26.021 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.intFormat avgt 15 84.432 ? 4.145 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.longFormat avgt 15 87.330 ? 6.111 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.stringFormat avgt 15 63.985 ? 11.366 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.stringIntFormat avgt 15 87.422 ? 0.147 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.widthStringFormat avgt 15 250.740 ? 32.639 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.widthStringIntFormat avgt 15 312.474 ? 16.309 ns/op
>>
>> +Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> +StringFormat.complexFormat avgt 15 740.626 ? 66.671 ns/op (+151.45)
>> +StringFormat.int02Format avgt 15 131.049 ? 0.432 ns/op (+138.46)
>> +StringFormat.intFormat avgt 15 67.229 ? 4.155 ns/op (+25.59)
>> +StringFormat.longFormat avgt 15 66.444 ? 0.614 ns/op (+31.44)
>> +StringFormat.stringFormat avgt 15 62.619 ? 4.652 ns/op (+2.19)
>> +StringFormat.stringIntFormat avgt 15 89.606 ? 13.966 ns/op (-2.44)
>> +StringFormat.widthStringFormat avgt 15 52.462 ? 15.649 ns/op (+377.95)
>> +StringFormat.widthStringIntFormat avgt 15 101.814 ? 3.147 ns/op (+206.91)
>
> Meaningful external reviews take a _lot_ of engineering time on such a popular platform as the JDK.
> They make sense only on somehow stable code, otherwise they are a waste of human resources.
>
> So sure, take your time to stabilize your code, make your tests, but please refrain from keep on changing too much once you publish a PR. If reviewers have to face continuous changes, they might become uninterested in reviewing.
Thanks to @rgiulietti for the review, I have changed the FormatProcessor according to your suggestion and added test cases
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15776#issuecomment-1770659922
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list