RFR: 8318051: Duration.between uses exceptions for control flow

Eamonn McManus emcmanus at openjdk.org
Tue Oct 24 18:17:35 UTC 2023


On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:33:48 GMT, Eamonn McManus <emcmanus at openjdk.org> wrote:

> The existing logic uses nanosecond arithmetic to compute Duration.between. Since that can overflow for durations greater than 292 years, it has a try/catch that falls back to computing the seconds part and adjusting that for nanoseconds. However, exception handling is typically very expensive, so in cases like the one in the linked bug this method was a performance trap.
> 
> The new logic is essentially the old catch block. It needs a special case for when the number of seconds is 0, so it is slightly slower in that case. But in other cases it is probably somewhat faster, because it avoids a [division](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/8d9a4b43f4fff30fd217dab2c224e641cb913c18/src/java.base/share/classes/java/time/Duration.java#L283) and associated mod.
> 
> The test coverage in [`TCKDuration`](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/8d9a4b43f4fff30fd217dab2c224e641cb913c18/test/jdk/java/time/tck/java/time/TCKDuration.java#L780) is already very thorough so no new tests are needed.

Yes, what I tried was just removing the catch-block from the existing code and verifying that `TCKDuration` fails with `ArithmeticException`. It calls `between` on `Instant` values that are 500 years apart, which is enough to trigger nanosecond overflow. So both the original `try` and the original `catch` are tested.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16318#issuecomment-1777777159


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list