RFR: JDK-8319120: Unbound ScopedValue.get() throws the wrong exception
Alan Bateman
alanb at openjdk.org
Mon Oct 30 16:17:32 UTC 2023
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:57:23 GMT, Andrew Haley <aph at openjdk.org> wrote:
> The bug here is a thinko in `ScopedValue.scopedValueBindings()`.
>
> If the JVM runs out of resources, we throw a `VirtualMachineError`. Running out of resources can happen at almost any time, and can happen while `ScopedValue`'s internal structures are being modified, leaving them in an inconsistent state. We detect when a `VirtualMachineError` happens and walk the stack to find the most-recent set of `ScopedValue` bindings.
>
> When we crate a new `Thread`, we push a sentinel frame onto the stack that we can find in the case that we threw a `VirtualMachineError`. Threads created by the native invocation interface (rather than by Java threads) don't have that sentinel, so a search for it returns null. Therefore, in the rare cases where we have to do a stack walk, we must check for both `NEW_THREAD_BINDINGS` (the sentinel) and `null`. We weren't doing that, we were only checking for null.
test/jdk/java/lang/ScopedValue/UnboundValueTest.java line 4:
> 2:
> 3: /*
> 4: * @test
It might be better to name the test something like UnboundValueAfterOOME or something better, only because it's not a unit test for all unbound value cases.
You'll need to add a copyright header to the test. Also might be useful to add `@bug 8319120`.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16422#discussion_r1376484429
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list