RFR: 8268829: Provide an optimized way to walk the stack with Class object only [v11]

[Daniel Fuchs]

On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 18:22:40 GMT, Mandy Chung <mchung at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> 8268829: Provide an optimized way to walk the stack with Class object only
>> 
>> `StackWalker::walk` creates one `StackFrame` per frame and the current implementation
>> allocates one `StackFrameInfo` and one `MemberName` objects per frame. Some frameworks
>> like logging may only interest in the Class object but not the method name nor the BCI,
>> for example, filters out its implementation classes to find the caller class.  It's
>> similar to `StackWalker::getCallerClass` but allows a predicate to filter out the element.
>> 
>> This PR proposes to add `Option::DROP_METHOD_INFO` enum that requests to drop the method information.  If no method information is needed, a `StackWalker` with `DROP_METHOD_INFO`
>> can be used instead and such stack walker will save the overhead of extracting the method information
>> and the memory used for the stack walking.
>> 
>> New factory methods to take a parameter to specify the kind of stack walker to be created are defined.
>> This provides a simple way for existing code, for example logging frameworks, to take advantage of
>> this enhancement with the least change as it can keep the existing function for traversing
>> `StackFrame`s.
>> 
>> For example: to find the first caller filtering a known list of implementation class,
>> existing code can create a stack walker instance with `DROP_METHOD_INFO` option:
>> 
>> 
>>      StackWalker walker = StackWalker.getInstance(Option.DROP_METHOD_INFO, Option.RETAIN_CLASS_REFERENCE);
>>      Optional<Class<?>> callerClass = walker.walk(s ->
>>              s.map(StackFrame::getDeclaringClass)
>>               .filter(Predicate.not(implClasses::contains))
>>               .findFirst());
>> 
>> 
>> If method information is accessed on the `StackFrame`s produced by this stack walker such as
>> `StackFrame::getMethodName`, then `UnsupportedOperationException` will be thrown.
>> 
>> #### Javadoc & specdiff
>> 
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~mchung/api/java.base/java/lang/StackWalker.html
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~mchung/jdk22/specdiff/overview-summary.html
>> 
>> #### Alternatives Considered
>> One alternative is to provide a new API:
>> `<T> T walkClass(Function<? super Stream<Class<?>, ? extends T> function)`
>> 
>> In this case, the caller would need to pass a function that takes a stream
>> of `Class` object instead of `StackFrame`.  Existing code would have to
>> modify calls to the `walk` method to `walkClass` and the function body.
>> 
>> ### Implementation Details
>> 
>> A `StackWalker` configured with `DROP_METHOD_INFO` ...
>
> Mandy Chung has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   review feedback

Changes requested by dfuchs (Reviewer).

test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/lang/StackWalkBench.java line 60:

> 58:     static StackWalker walker(String name) {
> 59:         return switch (name) {
> 60:             case "class+method" -> WALKER;

don't you need to also change "default" into "class+method" in the `@Param({"default", "class_only"})` annotations below?

test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/lang/StackWalkBench.java line 78:

> 76:     public int mark = 4;
> 77: 
> 78:     @Param({"default", "class_only"})

(I mean here)

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15370#pullrequestreview-1616052545
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15370#discussion_r1318997721
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15370#discussion_r1318999463