RFR: 8314896: additional clarifications to reversed() default methods' implementation requirements

Brent Christian bchristi at openjdk.org
Sat Sep 23 02:39:17 UTC 2023


On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 21:12:44 GMT, Stuart Marks <smarks at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Wording changes to make clear that the scenarios described are merely examples and are not normative requirements.

Looks good.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by bchristi (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15799#pullrequestreview-1640769251


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list