RFR: 8316704: Regex-free parsing of Formatter and FormatProcessor specifiers [v7]
Claes Redestad
redestad at openjdk.org
Mon Sep 25 10:09:22 UTC 2023
On Sun, 24 Sep 2023 20:27:53 GMT, 温绍锦 <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> @cl4es made performance optimizations for the simple specifiers of String.format in PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/2830. Based on the same idea, I continued to make improvements. I made patterns like %2d %02d also be optimized.
>>
>> The following are the test results based on MacBookPro M1 Pro:
>>
>>
>> -Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> -StringFormat.complexFormat avgt 15 1862.233 ? 217.479 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.int02Format avgt 15 312.491 ? 26.021 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.intFormat avgt 15 84.432 ? 4.145 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.longFormat avgt 15 87.330 ? 6.111 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.stringFormat avgt 15 63.985 ? 11.366 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.stringIntFormat avgt 15 87.422 ? 0.147 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.widthStringFormat avgt 15 250.740 ? 32.639 ns/op
>> -StringFormat.widthStringIntFormat avgt 15 312.474 ? 16.309 ns/op
>>
>> +Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> +StringFormat.complexFormat avgt 15 740.626 ? 66.671 ns/op (+151.45)
>> +StringFormat.int02Format avgt 15 131.049 ? 0.432 ns/op (+138.46)
>> +StringFormat.intFormat avgt 15 67.229 ? 4.155 ns/op (+25.59)
>> +StringFormat.longFormat avgt 15 66.444 ? 0.614 ns/op (+31.44)
>> +StringFormat.stringFormat avgt 15 62.619 ? 4.652 ns/op (+2.19)
>> +StringFormat.stringIntFormat avgt 15 89.606 ? 13.966 ns/op (-2.44)
>> +StringFormat.widthStringFormat avgt 15 52.462 ? 15.649 ns/op (+377.95)
>> +StringFormat.widthStringIntFormat avgt 15 101.814 ? 3.147 ns/op (+206.91)
>
> 温绍锦 has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> fix logic error
I think this is shaping up nicely. Some unused code, then I think we can move ahead.
The new `FormatSpecifierParser` utility class adds a bit of boilerplate for something that could be a static utility: https://github.com/wenshao/jdk/pull/6 - but perhaps splitting it up a bit more helps JIT inlining further. I can take this on as a follow-up RFE if you prefer.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Formatter.java line 3140:
> 3138: }
> 3139:
> 3140: FormatSpecifier(char conv, int flag, int width, int precision) {
This appears to be unused.
-------------
Changes requested by redestad (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15776#pullrequestreview-1641781843
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15776#discussion_r1335667901
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list