RFR: 8314986: Module readability resolution is slow with large numbers of automatic modules

Alan Bateman alanb at openjdk.org
Tue Sep 26 15:01:13 UTC 2023


On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:19:55 GMT, Technici4n <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Fixes the issue (hopefully) by resolving automatic modules and automatic module dependencies after propagation of non-automatic transitive dependencies. The module tests run.
> 
> I also added a few asserts to validate that the automatic modules don't read themselves (previously this was the case with > 1 automatic module). Should these asserts be added in more places or is this enough?
> 
> Alan also mentioned a conflict with the spec, I'm not sure which spec is being referred to. The documentation of `ResolvedModule#reads` states `A possibly-empty unmodifiable set`, implying that the set can be empty.
> 
> Finally, `Configuration#reads` states `// The sets stored in the graph are already immutable sets` but that does not seem to be true. Should something be done about this to limit allocation?
> 
> Please let me know!
> Cheers

This issue is on my plate, I will have a PR for this soon. I attached the patch to JDK-8314986 that I was testing in August to skip propagating "requires" through the "requires transitive" edges of the dependence graph. There are several spec issues to work through, the conflict that I mentioned in the JBS issue is that every module is specified to read itself but that is problematic for ResolvedModule::reads to include itself.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15926#issuecomment-1735718603


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list