RFR: JDK-8322979: Add informative discussion to Modifier [v4]
Pavel Rappo
prappo at openjdk.org
Thu Aug 22 17:26:12 UTC 2024
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:38:50 GMT, Alan Bateman <alanb at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Modifier.java line 238:
>>
>>> 236: * modifiers of a class or member, source-level modifiers that do
>>> 237: * not <em>not</em> have a constant in the this class should be
>>> 238: * included and ordered consistent with the full recommended
>>
>> Suggestion:
>>
>> * included and ordered consistently with the full recommended
>
> Yes, "ordered consistently with" or "with order consistent with", I think both will work here.
I think, Joe might be considering "consistent" to be [flat](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_adverb).
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17338#discussion_r1727539409
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list