RFR: 8338526: Don't store abstract and interface Klasses in class metaspace [v2]

Coleen Phillimore coleenp at openjdk.org
Fri Aug 23 20:46:39 UTC 2024


On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 20:43:52 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <coleenp at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This change stores InstanceKlass for interface and abstract classes in the non-class metaspace, since class metaspace will have limits on number of classes that can be represented when Lilliput changes go in.  Classes that have no instances created for them don't require compressed class pointers.  The generated LambdaForm classes are also AllStatic, and changing them to abstract moves them to non-class metaspace too.  It's not technically great to make them abstract and not final but you can't have both.  Java classfile access flags have no way of specifying something like AllStatic.
>> 
>> Tested with tier1-8.
>
> Coleen Phillimore has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Incorporated a set of Thomas Stuefe's comments. Take out AbstractClass MetaspaceObj::Type.

Thanks for reviewing this and your comments Thomas.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19157#pullrequestreview-2258059047


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list