RFR: 8339115: Rename TypeKind enum constants to follow code style [v3]

[Adam Sotona]

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 21:24:34 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> `TypeKind` enum constants are named in wrong code style; correct them before finalization.
>> 
>> Also improved `TypeKind` specification to talk about not mentioned `returnType`, `void`, and subword types being erased to int (and how). See the associated CSR too.
>> 
>> See the HTML output for the changed `JSpec` taglet's `6.5.newarray` rendering: https://cr.openjdk.org/~liach/8339115-typekind/java.base/java/lang/classfile/TypeKind.html
>> 
>> Note: when reviewing, please use https://cr.openjdk.org/~iris/se/23/spec/draft/java-se-23-draft-spec-37/ instead of JVMS 22 for reference; JVMS 23 has fixed a few ambiguities about subword types being absent from JVM's stack and locals.
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   space

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/classfile/CodeBuilder.java line 564:

> 562:                 case INT -> {
> 563:                     switch (computationalFrom) {
> 564:                         case FLOAT -> f2i();

Actual implementation shows complete conversion table as nested switches.
What is the advantage of the proposed change?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20737#discussion_r1735680790