RFR: 8333446: Add tests for hierarchical container support [v6]

Matthias Baesken mbaesken at openjdk.org
Thu Aug 29 15:24:30 UTC 2024


On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:13:07 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review this PR which adds test support for systemd slices so that bugs like [JDK-8217338](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8217338) can be verified. The added test, `SystemdMemoryAwarenessTest` currently passes on cgroups v1 and fails on cgroups v2 due to the way how [JDK-8217338](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8217338) was implemented when JDK 13 was a thing. Therefore immediately problem-listed. It should get unlisted once [JDK-8322420](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8322420) merges.
>> 
>> I'm adding those tests in order to not regress another time.
>> 
>> Testing:
>> - [x] Container tests on Linux x86_64 cgroups v2 and Linux x86_64 cgroups v1.
>> - [x] New systemd test on cg v1 (passes). Fails on cg v2 (due to  JDK-8322420)
>> - [x] GHA
>
> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 10 additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Add root check for SystemdMemoryAwarenessTest.java
>  - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8333446-systemd-slice-tests
>  - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8333446-systemd-slice-tests
>  - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8333446-systemd-slice-tests
>  - Add Whitebox check for host cpu
>  - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8333446-systemd-slice-tests
>  - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8333446-systemd-slice-tests
>  - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-8333446-systemd-slice-tests
>  - Fix comments
>  - 8333446: Add tests for hierarchical container support

test/hotspot/jtreg/containers/systemd/SystemdMemoryAwarenessTest.java line 58:

> 56:         SystemdRunOptions opts = SystemdTestUtils.newOpts("HelloSystemd");
> 57:         // 1 GB memory
> 58:         opts.memoryLimit("1000M");

Just wondering - is 1G here possible (the comment states 1 GB / 1024M) ?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19530#discussion_r1736474134


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list