RFR: 8345185: Some tests in test/jdk/tools/jpackage fail with a JDK without JMODs

[Severin Gehwolf]

On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 17:31:37 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk <asemenyuk at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Yes, I feared this might be a concern. If we change how `jpackage` defines `ALL-DEFAULT` we could reduce it. The remaining use would be the case for issuing a warning for missing `jmods` directory, for which it's probably not worth keeping the dependency.
>> 
>> Input from `jpackage` devs would be appreciated.
>
>>  If we change how jpackage defines ALL-DEFAULT we could reduce it
> 
> I agree. jpackage can define ` ALL-DEFAULT` using public API, no need to use internal API.

@alexeysemenyukoracle Do you mean it would be OK to re-define `ALL-DEFAULT` to not include `jdk.jlink` for runtime images? Would that be OK in general for `jpackage`?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22644#discussion_r1876420326